MEET FIRSTQA YOUR QA PARTNER.

An AI quality partner for every engineer. It learns your product, finds gaps in requirements and risks in implementation, builds test cases, tests in the browser, catches bugs, and posts a high-signal GO / NO-GO on every PR.

PRs & TICKETS ANALYZED
24/7ON STANDBY
< 60sFIRST ANALYSIS
GO/NO-GOON EVERY PR
PR #52 — Add tags to thought capture
🎫Ticket MN-89 opened — 3 QA questions posted
💬/qa triggered by @alex on PR #52
🔍QA’ing: 3 user-facing flows affected
🐛1 blocker · 1 non-blocker
[BLOCKER] Tags lost on Cmd+Enter save
[minor] Autocomplete stays open after selection
📋Generated 9 test scenarios · QA review posted
💬/qa testrun -env=staging.app.com -context "trial user"
🌐Exploratory testing in the browser…
📊7 passed · 2 failed · Screenshots attached
🚦NO-GO — 1 blocker must be fixed · minor can ship
THE PROBLEM

AI WRITES TONS OF CODE.
TESTING HASN’T CAUGHT UP.
CODE REVIEW ISN’T QA.

AI is generating more code than any team can check — and the tools built for it only review the code. But code review isn’t QA. Nobody’s covering the real question, end to end: does it actually work for the user — from the ticket, to the PR, to the browser? That gap is where the bugs live.

WHAT FIRSTQA DOES

THE QA PARTNER FOR
EVERY ENGINEER.

1
CONNECT

One click to GitHub + Linear. FirstQA learns your product.

2
TRIGGER

Comment /qa on any PR or ticket.

3
SHIP

~60s later — bugs caught, test recipe, browser test run.

Linear — feat: Add tags to task cards · STANLI-89
A
alex · just now
/qa
F
FirstQA Bot · just now
🏗Building product knowledge from your repositories. Full QA analysis will be posted once indexing is complete.
How it works

Comment /qa on any Linear or Jira ticket, or any GitHub PR. FirstQA reads your codebase context, understands your product, and posts a full QA analysis in under 2 minutes.

Linear — feat: Add tags to task cards · STANLI-89
F
FirstQA Bot
📊 QA Analysis – by FirstQA (the AI QA)
MetricValue
DecisionNeeds Clarification
RiskMedium
Impacttasks, filtering, ui, data-persistence
🔍 Requirement Gaps
Tag creation workflow: Inline on task card, dedicated page, or both?
Filtering behavior: Multiple tag filters — AND or OR logic?
Predefined tags: Can workspace admins create them?
✏️ Test Recipe
ScenarioExpectedPriority
Create new tag on task cardTag appears, persists after refreshP0
Apply multiple tags to taskAll tags display distinctlyP0
Filter by single tagOnly matching tasks shownP0
Remove tag from taskTag gone, exits filterP1
GitHub — feat(DFY): DFY Control Center on /chat · PR #271
Merged feat(DFY): DFY Control Center on /chat #271
F
oviai-by-firstqa Bot
🎯 QA Analysis – by FirstQA (the AI QA)
✅ Analyzing 36 commits in this PR.
MetricValueDetails
Decision● ShipNo critical issues, feature flag gated
RiskLowAll mutations have proper error handling
ImpactHomepage, drafts, scheduling
🔍 Bugs & Risks
✅ No critical issues found.
ScenarioExpectedPriority
Navigate to homepage when DFY enabled"Drafted for you" section appearsP0
Click DFY draft cardEditor modal opens with draftP0
Schedule DFY draft from cardPurple "Scheduled" pill appearsP0
📄 Playwright Tests — Download spec.ts (15 scenarios)
GitHub — feat(DFY): DFY Control Center on /chat · PR #271
F
oviai-by-firstqa Bot
👑 FirstQA — Test Execution: ❌ 2/14 Tests Failed
12/14 passed (86%) · 9m 54s · Chromium · Watch recording
#ScenarioPriorityStatus
1Homepage with no DFY draftsP1❌ Fail
2DFY modal — no "Get feedback" buttonP1❌ Fail
3Post DFY draft via editorP0🔶 Partial
4Navigate to homepage when DFY enabledP0✅ Pass
5Click DFY draft cardP0✅ Pass
6Schedule DFY draft from cardP0✅ Pass
7Unschedule from DFY dropdownP1✅ Pass
8Post to LinkedIn from draft editorRegression✅ Pass

USED IN PRODUCTION BY

“Last week the PR Analysis was very useful — it caught a flashing UI element on the homepage and different states based on feature flag status. Greptile and other review tools didn’t catch that. They give feedback, then compounded feedback, then more compounded feedback. It gets tiring. FirstQA just tells you what matters.”

S
STAN
stan.store

“The ticket analysis surprised me. FirstQA flagged three gaps in a spec we thought was solid — caught a multi-tenant edge case our team would have shipped without thinking about it. Cut a sprint of rework.”

A
AGI INC.
theagi.company
PRICING

ONE PLAN.
UNLIMITED USAGE.

7-day free trial — card required
No per-seat fees, ever
Cancel anytime
NEED EXTRA HANDS?

Add a QA Engineer in the loop.

For startups that want a senior QA in the loop alongside FirstQA — exploratory testing, release sign-offs, complex regression sweeps. Available on-demand or as a monthly add-on.

FAQ

THINGS FOUNDERS
USUALLY ASK.

Will it spam my PRs with noise?

No. FirstQA posts one structured comment per PR — bugs, test scenarios, and results in a single, scannable block. Your team won't notice it's there until they need it.

What permissions does it need?

Read access to your code and PRs, write access to post comments. It never merges, never pushes, never runs destructive actions. You stay in full control.

Will it slow my team down?

The opposite. Analysis runs in the background and is ready by the time your reviewer opens the PR. No waiting, no manual QA handoffs, no back-and-forth.

What if we already have CI/CD tests?

FirstQA complements your existing tests. It catches what unit and integration tests miss — UX edge cases, missing requirements, flows that break in a real browser.

What does it cost?

FirstQA is $299/mo — unlimited usage, every feature, no per-seat fees. Founding pricing, locked forever if you join before launch. Includes a 7-day free trial — card required, cancel before day 8 and pay nothing. Replaces a QA hire at a fraction of the cost.

What tools does it work with?

GitHub and Linear today. Bitbucket support is in progress. FirstQA posts results wherever your team already works — no new dashboard to adopt.